Benghazi "Scandal"

Post spam, politics, funny things, personal stories, whatever you want. Please remain respectful of all individuals regardless of their views!

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby MATTHEW'S_DAD » Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:12 am

Barry O legitimized a goofy Youtube video at the UN and now these clowns smell blood in the water.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSB ... 3?irpc=932

Oh well, keep screaming at a 12 year old guys, the world is going to happen with or without you.
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Ben Franklin
User avatar
MATTHEW'S_DAD
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:47 pm
Location: behind you
Xfire: matthewsdad

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby [m'kay] » Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:35 am

3.14pi wrote:
MATTHEW'S_DAD wrote:The administration covered up the bungling of this entire situation without a doubt. Obama and his team are in over their heads and it's obvious to most Americans and Europeans and worst of all, Putin. (But that's a whole other thread)

What I'm trying to figure out is why Kjep is being called a racist and cussed at. I've read this thing twice, on my phone unfortunately, and I'm just not getting it.


Cause they are damn insane MD.

It's always how liberals are: people who don't agree with them never have legitimate reason to disagree, they're just racists.

They are trying to say that I'm a racist because I said that the content of the video is accurate according to Islam, however, I also said that it is still offensive and should not have been released.


Haha, yep, i'm a liberal alright. You totally called it. It's not as if i'm incredibly loud about being a moderate or anything. Whatever - if calling me a liberal and dismissing everything I said helps you sleep at night, then so be it. You wanted to have a discussion, you wanted to be treated like an adult? Well okay then. That's what I treated you as. And you couldn't even bring yourself to post an actual response, instead just using political rhetoric and otherization tactics in order to make your opponents look foolish. You'll definitely make a fantastic politician.
User avatar
[m'kay]
MVP
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby MATTHEW'S_DAD » Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:42 am

Yeah, Mkay's not a lib....he's just pissed off at all of them. I can't say that I disagree with that philosophy.
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Ben Franklin
User avatar
MATTHEW'S_DAD
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:47 pm
Location: behind you
Xfire: matthewsdad

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby Outrider » Sun Oct 14, 2012 2:21 am

3.14pi wrote:
MATTHEW'S_DAD wrote:The administration covered up the bungling of this entire situation without a doubt. Obama and his team are in over their heads and it's obvious to most Americans and Europeans and worst of all, Putin. (But that's a whole other thread)

What I'm trying to figure out is why Kjep is being called a racist and cussed at. I've read this thing twice, on my phone unfortunately, and I'm just not getting it.


Cause they are damn insane MD.

It's always how liberals are: people who don't agree with them never have legitimate reason to disagree, they're just racists.

They are trying to say that I'm a racist because I said that the content of the video is accurate according to Islam, however, I also said that it is still offensive and should not have been released.

Um...what? Who was calling you a racist? Even if you or anyone did support that video, that's not being racist at all, just anti-Muslim. And for the record, talking about race or bringing up racism doesn't make one a racist....
User avatar
Outrider
Community Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:43 am

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby WD-40 » Sun Oct 14, 2012 2:47 am

"Ohhh the webs we weave, when first we practice to decieve"...

...and Obama and his administration have been 'practicing' that for almost 4 years now. It's gotten so bad, that even the vast Liberal media Majority cannot bury the evidence. His problem with Benghazi, is the overwhelming evidence of an obvious assault (vesus some video demonstration) at the Embassy 'off-site'. The fact that it happened so quickly, and was so well coordinated meant it was 'planned'. The fact that automatic weapons and rocket launchers were involed, also strongly suggested terrorism. That was known to the Intel community (and therefore the Whitehouse and Dept of State) in the first 24 hours. However, Obama is was counting on the Intel community and eventually the press to help him bury the facts and prevent this embarrassing black-eye to his foreign policy failure. With elections looming, foreign policy is what Obama considers (considered actually) to be his best success, and he cannot afford to be embarrased on it.

What really pissed me off the most was his indifference to 'leading' and doing his usual self-serving activities by campaigning in Nevada the very day after one of his Ambassadors and 3 others were murdered. He had all the facts he needed, so he left DC because he was more concerned about getting re-elected.
He easily could have sent in an ass-load of marines to Benghazi, to secure the area, and also preserve the evidence. The Libyan Government would not have stood in the way. But I'm sure after some quick fact checking, they probably realized thru the State Department that several prior requests were made for added security, even by the Ambassador himself. Therefore, evidence is the last thing Obama wanted found. Interestingly, CNN found an important piece of evidence for him (To his dismay)...the Ambassador's Diary. So many people inside the intelligence community knew the truth, so the facts started leaking out, thereby screwing up Obama's game plan. Conflicting information soon began being released, and then came the finger-pointing...most recently Biden sticking it to the Intel Community and the State Department saying nobody told the Whitehouse about security concerns. And they call Romney a liar....

Now Obama has to stick to his guns and continue lying to the American People about what he knew and when. To say he knew more alot sooner, would surely destroy what's left of his practically non-existent credibility, and would destroy his re-election chances. There just aren't enough stupid people in the US to re-elect him after something like that...yep even in America. Obama is a lazy, amateur, narcisstic, lying, self-serving person, who loves the 'perks' of the Presidency, but hates having to do the demanding 'work' that's required. I think the majority of American people are finally figuring it out. Hopefully, it will still all be fresh in their minds by Election Day.
User avatar
WD-40
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 4537
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Likely on some crappy Hotel internet connection
Xfire: faststart0777

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby Nik » Sun Oct 14, 2012 3:08 am

WD-40 wrote:"Ohhh the webs we weave, when first we practice to decieve"...

...and Obama and his administration have been 'practicing' that for almost 4 years now. It's gotten so bad, that even the vast Liberal media Majority cannot bury the evidence. His problem with Benghazi, is the overwhelming evidence of an obvious assault (vesus some video demonstration) at the Embassy 'off-site'. The fact that it happened so quickly, and was so well coordinated meant it was 'planned'. The fact that automatic weapons and rocket launchers were involed, also strongly suggested terrorism. That was known to the Intel community (and therefore the Whitehouse and Dept of State) in the first 24 hours. However, Obama is was counting on the Intel community and eventually the press to help him bury the facts and prevent this embarrassing black-eye to his foreign policy failure. With elections looming, foreign policy is what Obama considers (considered actually) to be his best success, and he cannot afford to be embarrased on it.

What really pissed me off the most was his indifference to 'leading' and doing his usual self-serving activities by campaigning in Nevada the very day after one of his Ambassadors and 3 others were murdered. He had all the facts he needed, so he left DC because he was more concerned about getting re-elected.
He easily could have sent in an ass-load of marines to Benghazi, to secure the area, and also preserve the evidence. The Libyan Government would not have stood in the way. But I'm sure after some quick fact checking, they probably realized thru the State Department that several prior requests were made for added security, even by the Ambassador himself. Therefore, evidence is the last thing Obama wanted found. Interestingly, CNN found an important piece of evidence for him (To his dismay)...the Ambassador's Diary. So many people inside the intelligence community knew the truth, so the facts started leaking out, thereby screwing up Obama's game plan. Conflicting information soon began being released, and then came the finger-pointing...most recently Biden sticking it to the Intel Community and the State Department saying nobody told the Whitehouse about security concerns. And they call Romney a liar....

Now Obama has to stick to his guns and continue lying to the American People about what he knew and when. To say he knew more alot sooner, would surely destroy what's left of his practically non-existent credibility, and would destroy his re-election chances. There just aren't enough stupid people in the US to re-elect him after something like that...yep even in America. Obama is a lazy, amateur, narcisstic, lying, self-serving person, who loves the 'perks' of the Presidency, but hates having to do the demanding 'work' that's required. I think the majority of American people are finally figuring it out. Hopefully, it will still all be fresh in their minds by Election Day.


Finally something worth reading. I think you hit the nail on the head there WD.
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Nik
Community Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:49 pm
Location: In your belly!
Xfire: 2badnik
Steam ID: Magnetar1

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby kjeopardy » Sun Oct 14, 2012 3:28 am

WD-40 wrote:"Ohhh the webs we weave, when first we practice to decieve"...

...and Obama and his administration have been 'practicing' that for almost 4 years now. It's gotten so bad, that even the vast Liberal media Majority cannot bury the evidence. His problem with Benghazi, is the overwhelming evidence of an obvious assault (vesus some video demonstration) at the Embassy 'off-site'. The fact that it happened so quickly, and was so well coordinated meant it was 'planned'. The fact that automatic weapons and rocket launchers were involed, also strongly suggested terrorism. That was known to the Intel community (and therefore the Whitehouse and Dept of State) in the first 24 hours. However, Obama is was counting on the Intel community and eventually the press to help him bury the facts and prevent this embarrassing black-eye to his foreign policy failure. With elections looming, foreign policy is what Obama considers (considered actually) to be his best success, and he cannot afford to be embarrased on it.

What really pissed me off the most was his indifference to 'leading' and doing his usual self-serving activities by campaigning in Nevada the very day after one of his Ambassadors and 3 others were murdered. He had all the facts he needed, so he left DC because he was more concerned about getting re-elected.
He easily could have sent in an ass-load of marines to Benghazi, to secure the area, and also preserve the evidence. The Libyan Government would not have stood in the way. But I'm sure after some quick fact checking, they probably realized thru the State Department that several prior requests were made for added security, even by the Ambassador himself. Therefore, evidence is the last thing Obama wanted found. Interestingly, CNN found an important piece of evidence for him (To his dismay)...the Ambassador's Diary. So many people inside the intelligence community knew the truth, so the facts started leaking out, thereby screwing up Obama's game plan. Conflicting information soon began being released, and then came the finger-pointing...most recently Biden sticking it to the Intel Community and the State Department saying nobody told the Whitehouse about security concerns. And they call Romney a liar....

Now Obama has to stick to his guns and continue lying to the American People about what he knew and when. To say he knew more alot sooner, would surely destroy what's left of his practically non-existent credibility, and would destroy his re-election chances. There just aren't enough stupid people in the US to re-elect him after something like that...yep even in America. Obama is a lazy, amateur, narcisstic, lying, self-serving person, who loves the 'perks' of the Presidency, but hates having to do the demanding 'work' that's required. I think the majority of American people are finally figuring it out. Hopefully, it will still all be fresh in their minds by Election Day.


Less diplomatic than what I say, but same idea...He totally knew what it was, and covered it up.

Not calling Narg a liberal, he hasn't expressed any political views in this thread, just that I've really annoyed him.

@Outrider: wasn't referring to you
"Mathematics is the queen of sciences and number theory is the queen of mathematics. She often condescends to render service to astronomy and other natural sciences, but in all relations she is entitled to the first rank."~Karl Friedrich Gauss
User avatar
kjeopardy
Community Member
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:13 am
Location: Right Behind You
Xfire: kjeopardy

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby Outrider » Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:30 pm

WD-40 wrote:There just aren't enough stupid people in the US to re-elect him after something like that...yep even in America.

Right, because voters choose a candidate mostly based on his foreign policy and minimally weigh in on his domestic policies to decide. :-| With that kind of thinking, no one would vote for Romney either due to his inexperience with foreign policy.
WD-40 wrote:Obama is a lazy, amateur, narcisstic, lying, self-serving person, who loves the 'perks' of the Presidency, but hates having to do the demanding 'work' that's required.

You know all of this how exactly? And really? Lazy? Wow, you sit there insulting the President as if you actually have what it takes to be one. I can understand Bill Clinton doing it because he's been President before, but you're just some guy who is afraid of paying more taxes or whatever your beef is. Just unbelievable...
User avatar
Outrider
Community Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:43 am

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby MATTHEW'S_DAD » Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:38 pm

Lol.

WD is probably the most qualifed person here that can speak about this subject. From the moment kjep started this topic, I was interested to hear what WD's take would be.

WD, thanks for that post dude.....pure money shot. :th_a017:
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Ben Franklin
User avatar
MATTHEW'S_DAD
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:47 pm
Location: behind you
Xfire: matthewsdad

Re: Benghazi "Scandal"

Postby WD-40 » Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:51 am

Outrider wrote:
WD-40 wrote:There just aren't enough stupid people in the US to re-elect him after something like that...yep even in America.

Right, because voters choose a candidate mostly based on his foreign policy and minimally weigh in on his domestic policies to decide. :-| With that kind of thinking, no one would vote for Romney either due to his inexperience with foreign policy.

Experience...Hmmmm...A guy who not only understands how to make money (i.e. for the US...which is a higher priority for US Citizens than Foreign Policy), but also knows what he's doing with a successful bi-partisan history as Governor. Compared to a...oh yeah...a Community Organizer! W.T.F. is a Community Organizer?!?
WD-40 wrote:Obama is a lazy, amateur, narcisstic, lying, self-serving person, who loves the 'perks' of the Presidency, but hates having to do the demanding 'work' that's required.

Outrider wrote:You know all of this how exactly? And really? Lazy? Wow, you sit there insulting the President as if you actually have what it takes to be one. I can understand Bill Clinton doing it because he's been President before, but you're just some guy who is afraid of paying more taxes or whatever your beef is. Just unbelievable...


You know kid...I'm now 50 years old and I've been around the block, have a career as a Naval Officer, and now work a lot closer to the 'fire' with all this B.S. that goes on in Government, than I care to tell you. Now...Obama was quoted as saying it was a 'real drag' that his handlers were simply trying to prepare him for a simple debate between him and Romney. You saw the outcome! It's a simple view of his thinking and performance as President! He's lazy! Same as his track record as President these past 4 years. He takes the easy road, hates conflict or effort. Certainly, there's a lot of people here on SWGO that could do a better job as President than Obama. Hell, I'd vote Matt C in, and he's a Liberal! Why?? Because he's not stupid, narcisstic, lying, or self-serving! Afraid of paying more taxes?? Seriously?? Who isn't?!? I suspect you don't pay taxes...or not enough to matter much due to your income level at this time. This Prez has outspent George Bush in only 4 years what it took Georgie 8!! Sooo many Billions wasted on the most stupid [poo] you can imagine...some of it for personal friends. And nothing to show for it.

As far as Bill Clinton is concerned..his 'Health' is actually failing. He is very worried that he will not be around to help Hillary get elected as Prez. Time is an issue for Bill Clinton! If Obama gets his 4 more years (Provided the U.S. isn't already beyond repair), he may still be around to help her out. If Romney gets elected, there's a strong possibility he would have to wait not only 4, but maybe 8, or even 16 years if Ryan follows a successful Romney Presidency. Get it?? Do the math! Hillary is then too [m'kay] old to run, and Clinton is already a rotting corpse in the ground and of no help! THAT'S the only reason Clinton helped Obama this time around giving a very good speech (laden with bull shiit) at the Democratic Convention. Can't blame him really. he's a pure politician. Lying comes easily. Hillary covered up his numerous infidelities. He owes her! Plus, if she gets elected, he gets to live, not only in the White House, but in the 'lime light' he craves so desperately. He lives for it! That's one reason why he's such a good politician!

But now Benghazi...Pi (3.14) brought up a very polarized subject. Now, to Bill Clinton's dismay, sees that Hillary is now culpable in the coverup. That is a career ender dude! She, by serving her Boss the Prez, is now culpable in the coverup. She was the natural choice to succeed Obama. So being that too many facts have leaked out, and are now made public to the 'voters', a serious change in what will happen in the next 2 selections for President are at stake! Therefore, the future of the U.S.. Hillary is sucked in like a vacuum cleaner! She HAS to play ball now with Obama!

Obama simply wants to get re-elected...and as I said, if you have been following anything over the past 4 years...he loves the 'perks', but hates the 'Job'. God kid...he even wouldn't DO his job and meet with world Leaders recently at the UN conference, preferring instead to appear on that stupid [m'kay] show 'The View' with a bunch of women who love themselves too much (save one) for political exposure! THAT is irresponsible!! PERIOD!! That alone should have clued you in on Obama's personality and work ethic.

Thanks MD, Nik, and Pi for the kudos. Yeahh...being that close to the fire, it can be frustrating. But hopefully, we have enough intelligent voters who see Obama for who he really is, and eject his stupid ass from office on Nov 6th!
User avatar
WD-40
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 4537
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Likely on some crappy Hotel internet connection
Xfire: faststart0777

PreviousNext

Return to Non-Game Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests