WD-40 wrote:But wish that they were female.
Absolutely wrong.
WD-40 wrote:Also, I do not see the 'danger' in this way of thinking,
Well, for one, it contains a massive amount of implied sexism.
WD-40 wrote:But wish that they were female.
WD-40 wrote:Also, I do not see the 'danger' in this way of thinking,
CommanderOtto wrote:It is pretty much common sense. Don't approve of homosexuality
Doves wrote:CommanderOtto wrote:It is pretty much common sense. Don't approve of homosexuality
Pardon?
Darth Crater wrote:WD-40 wrote:But wish that they were female.
Absolutely wrong. But how do you know it's wrong? You assume it's wrong, I assume it's right. Between most gay men's Lisping, limp wristed body language/posture, feminine squeaky voices and overly emotional drama in how they converse or get excited over stuff screaming like women, it's hard to think otherwise. It's all over TV now. They know anything and everything about fashion for women more than men's fashion! Reality TV shows like Rupal's drag race features gays dressing like women and really feeling comfortable in their skin being as feminine as possible.WD-40 wrote:Also, I do not see the 'danger' in this way of thinking,
Well, for one, it contains a massive amount of implied sexism.
WD-40 wrote:Darth Crater wrote:WD-40 wrote:But wish that they were female.
Absolutely wrong. But how do you know it's wrong? You assume it's wrong, I assume it's right. Between most gay men's Lisping, limp wristed body language/posture, feminine squeaky voices and overly emotional drama in how they converse or get excited over stuff screaming like women, it's hard to think otherwise. It's all over TV now. They know anything and everything about fashion for women more than men! Reality TV shows like Rupal's drag race features gays dressing like women and really feeling comfortable in their skin being as feminine as possible.
[m'kay] wrote:
Yeah, and one time I saw Jersey Shore and it really made it clear how all people in New Jersey are obnoxious wastes of space that barely deserve to breathe. Are you listening to yourself, WD? There are plenty of gay guys that are, y'know, guys that like to have sex with dudes. It's pretty [m'kay] up to stereotype an entire subset of the population because you see [poo] on TV. And for the record, if it was ever "all over TV" that was maybe ten years ago. Now, people are a lot less dickish about that sort of thing. Being transsexual is a lot different from being homosexual.
Doves wrote:I think that gay men have increased amounts of estrogen, and lesbian women have increased amounts of testosterone. Im not 100% positive if that is why, but it makes sense to me. And maybe it isnt the way nature intended, but i dont think the population is going to run low anytime soon.
Doves wrote:I think that gay men have increased amounts of estrogen, and lesbian women have increased amounts of testosterone. Im not 100% positive if that is why, but it makes sense to me. And maybe it isnt the way nature intended, but i dont think the population is going to run low anytime soon.
WD-40 wrote:But how do you know it's wrong? You assume it's wrong, I assume it's right. Between most gay men's Lisping, limp wristed body language/posture, feminine squeaky voices and overly emotional drama in how they converse or get excited over stuff screaming like women, it's hard to think otherwise. It's all over TV now. They know anything and everything about fashion for women more than men's fashion! Reality TV shows like Rupal's drag race features gays dressing like women and really feeling comfortable in their skin being as feminine as possible.
WD-40 wrote:Only one? I only implied a 'theory' that involves 'spiritual sexuality'. I don't expect an atheist to understand or even accept it, but it's only meant as one 'possibility'. Sexual desire exists between men vs women and same sex. But 'why' does it exist at all? Phermones?, appealing body parts?, physiological hunger and a need for sexual contact with...a guy, or a girl? Who to choose...Hmmmm...am I feeling like a man or a woman right now? If I'm a dude...why would I want to be with another dude? It's not natural. Men cannot produce babies having anal sex together, anymore than to women using a dildo can. So there must be some spiritual connection here. And I believe the 'spirit' is the true essence of the person...not the person's body. It's just a possible way to explain the attraction between same sex individuals.
WD-40 wrote:[m'kay] wrote:
Yeah, and one time I saw Jersey Shore and it really made it clear how all people in New Jersey are obnoxious wastes of space that barely deserve to breathe. Are you listening to yourself, WD? There are plenty of gay guys that are, y'know, guys that like to have sex with dudes. It's pretty [m'kay] up to stereotype an entire subset of the population because you see [poo] on TV. And for the record, if it was ever "all over TV" that was maybe ten years ago. Now, people are a lot less dickish about that sort of thing. Being transsexual is a lot different from being homosexual.
Last I checked, guys that like to have sex with 'dudes'..are 'gay', so I don't know what you're getting at there. It is on TV more these days, because it has become much more accepted.
And you think I get my observations from just TV?! Plleeeeasee! It's everywhere these days. Downtown NY and other large cities during visits I've had over the years, New Orleans, Key West, and some foreign countries even. I don't care if people are gay, or dudes that are acting all feminine...actually, it's amusing to me. I live in San Francisco in the late 80's. I saw that stuff all over back then! I just used TV reality as an example.
Darth Crater wrote:My views about biblical literalism should be obvious by this point. Same-sex marriage passes the most important moral test ("does it hurt anyone?") with flying colors; the Bible is just being used to justify disgust and bigotry. Much the same way it was used to oppose interracial marriage, in fact.
Return to Non-Game Discussions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests