Page 1 of 4

USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:44 pm
by nobody
USA is first at everything.
Image

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:54 pm
by Yanoda
Don't know when it was made but the CO2 emitters are wrong.
As of 2009. 1. China 2. USA 3. India 4. Russia

Cheers

Yanoda

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:58 pm
by nobody
Yanoda wrote:Don't know when it was made but the CO2 emitters are wrong.
As of 2009. 1. China 2. USA 3. India 4. Russia

Cheers

Yanoda

Are you biologist ?

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:11 pm
by (SWGO)Terminator
Ha ha, but then again britain is like always second...

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:43 pm
by Yanoda
Rawler wrote:Are you biologist ?

Biologists is the study of the science life and living organisms, not related to emissions.
You may be referring to a Meteorologist. If that is what you meant (to answer your question), kind of. Studying environmental sciences with atmospheric physics in mind (sub category of meteorology).
Either way, just a quick google search could give you the information as well.

Cheers

Yanoda

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:45 pm
by Flyswamper
Yanoda wrote:
Rawler wrote:Are you biologist ?

Biologists is the study of the science life and living organisms, not related to emissions.


Except for the fact that Cows are a huge emitter of methane, which is also a greenhouse gas... :) he he...

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:55 pm
by Duel of Fates
We have a lot of cows in the US. And don't forget our cattle. :roll:

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:24 pm
by (SWGO)Minas_Thirith
Yanoda is teoreticly right on this one.

I did my report on pollution, a damn 1 year investigation project.
Since china is now the hugest economic power of this world, my motto is "God made the world, the rest was made by china"
Since that china is overproducion @ their factories pollution levels have increased, to to mencion the traffic.

But technicly and this i did wrote in my report is the USA polluting more then they should compared to China.
If i'm not mistaken the USA pollutes more then 55% then the average would be, considering the population/CO ratio.
While China is polluting 0.2% more then they should, as if you calculate the population of China.......

So although China is the biggest polluter of the world, they pollute the quantety allowed with the Pop/Co ratio, unlike the USA.

MT. :nutz:

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:08 pm
by nobody
Image
(SWGO)MinasThirith wrote:Yanoda is teoreticly right on this one.

I did my report on pollution, a damn 1 year investigation project.
Since china is now the hugest economic power of this world, my motto is "God made the world, the rest was made by china"
Since that china is overproducion @ their factories pollution levels have increased, to to mencion the traffic.

But technicly and this i did wrote in my report is the USA polluting more then they should compared to China.
If i'm not mistaken the USA pollutes more then 55% then the average would be, considering the population/CO ratio.
While China is polluting 0.2% more then they should, as if you calculate the population of China.......

So although China is the biggest polluter of the world, they pollute the quantety allowed with the Pop/Co ratio, unlike the USA.

MT. :nutz:

Image

Re: USA #1

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:22 pm
by Yanoda
(SWGO)MinasThirith wrote:But technicly and this i did wrote in my report is the USA polluting more then they should compared to China.
If i'm not mistaken the USA pollutes more then 55% then the average would be, considering the population/CO ratio.
While China is polluting 0.2% more then they should, as if you calculate the population of China.......


True if you want to get into detail. Australia in terms of CO2/person has the biggest CO2 emissions (due to the amount of coal power plants).
Acquiring the true CO2 emissions of countries is difficult. You must also take into account the intercontinental trading. Considering it does not take place in a specific country, it would be difficult in categorizing which ship/plane/train etc... applies to that country. There is also the issue of emission/particulate transport where the emissions (not only CO2) can travel over vast distances and affect other region/countries. Good (visible) examples are the sand particles that get picked up by strong winds from the Sahara/Gobi Desert and travel to Europe/North America. There is also the question of waste/garbage (remember the island of trash in the North Pacific).

Flyswamper wrote:Except for the fact that Cows are a huge emitter of methane, which is also a greenhouse gas... :) he he...

That is very true Flyswamper, so we should also take into account for every human.
Now if we would all become vegetarians or avoid beef, then we would not need the cows and the cow/methane emission would be solved. Depends if we(I for that matter) can resist the juicy T-Bone steak...
There was supposed to be a herb that helps the cows in reducing their 'emissions', I believe reduce it like 50%, correct me if I'm wrong.

Cheers

Yanoda