Page 1 of 6

Ron Paul: Healthcare, Military Spending And The Debt Crisis

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:14 pm
by ӺȁȿŧƔ
From another thread:

Heatmaster78 wrote: :stupid:

Why do you have a Ron Paul for 2012 sticker as part of your signature? :eek:
You want someone who would willingly let a person, who just didn't happen to have health care, die for president?

Yes. It is that persons own fault for not having health care. I know that sounds cold hearted but we can't keep spending money we don't have. We can't be so dependent on our government to help us with everything and we need to be able to handle things ourselves. It's like we are still living in our parents basements living off our parents money and having them take care of us. Only our parents are broke and printing off fake money that they will have to pay back soon. We need to cut back the government and give more power to the people.
If you haven't noticed, our country faces a 15 trillion dollar debt, and Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate who has even addressed it at all. All the other candidates have said they will get jobs back, but jobs will never increase until the debt has been taken care of!

Re: Having people with no health care die

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:09 pm
by (SWGO)Minas_Thirith
Well from my point of view politics won't change the world's situacion...when humans get power they alwayes tend to abuse it in one way or another....
Anyhow i do not believe this current situacion can be turned around, if there were to be jobs then we would need to either compete or shut down china, else they will just produce the stuff we will consume but cheaper....also products are made as cheap as posible, as fast as posible, to break in a limited time wich is called "guarantee" we CAN make things to last for a lifetime, heck somewhere in England there is a light bulb that has been turned on for 110Years and still works perfectly....

Anyhow this is something even more funny "Quote"

"All this I have seen, and there was an applying of my heart to every work that has been done under the sun, [during] the time that man has dominated man to his injury." -Ecclesiastes 8:9

MT :lol:

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:04 am
by WD-40
Universal Health Care doesn't work. But making Healthcare 'affordable' for all is a step in the right direction. Obama's simply [m'kay] everyone, but he's a total idiot with no experience, so I saw that coming.

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:18 am
by fightingclam
This should be a great discussion.
As for my opinion....well, I don't have one ATM.....

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:31 am
by Brazosgrad
Ron Paul is from my current hometown. He doesn't have everyone's vote for a reason. Its the same reason he's never been elected President in all the times he has run for office. His ideas are too extreme for the silent majority to handle. Sorry. He'll never be elected. And no matter how good some of his ideas seem, they aren't ALL good ideas. The country's financial well-being depends on SOME debt to function healthily and properly, just not the overabundance of it that we seem to be shouldering now. And I hate to say it, but the debt combined with high fuel prices, and extreme water shortages that will become more and more common aren't going to make for a happy populace. I think I'll just go and watch the 3 Stooges. I'd rather laugh at the stupid things they do, than cry about the stupid things the politicians do. Just wait. I'll get even and die one day and then how are they gonna take my money?

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:50 am
by ӺȁȿŧƔ
Brazmin wrote:Ron Paul is from my current hometown. He doesn't have everyone's vote for a reason. Its the same reason he's never been elected President in all the times he has run for office. His ideas are too extreme for the silent majority to handle. Sorry. He'll never be elected. And no matter how good some of his ideas seem, they aren't ALL good ideas. The country's financial well-being depends on SOME debt to function healthily and properly, just not the overabundance of it that we seem to be shouldering now. And I hate to say it, but the debt combined with high fuel prices, and extreme water shortages that will become more and more common aren't going to make for a happy populace. I think I'll just go and watch the 3 Stooges. I'd rather laugh at the stupid things they do, than cry about the stupid things the politicians do. Just wait. I'll get even and die one day and then how are they gonna take my money?

He has more votes then you think! The bankers and the federal reserve have control over the media and they want to censor him. They say he has 11% popularity but he actually has 71% popularity. Go onto Youtube and watch all the other candidates ad videos. They all have more comments about Ron than the actual candidate that the ad is for! The polls are almost unanimous and soon the media wont be able to hide it any more. They had him on the Today Show for the first time in forever this morning which just goes to show that they are having trouble keeping him censored. Ron has said he wants to stop government growth and the government doesn't like that. He's immediately going to cut five departments and save us one trillion dollars within the first year. His ideas are too "extreme" for some people because he is actually making sense unlike the other candidates who babble on about nothing. He was unpopular back in the 70's and 80's but people are starting to wake up and see that what he said back then is starting to come true today.

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 1:18 am
by WD-40
The Media simply doesnt like Ron Paul. Personally, he'd be a great choice for the Presidency. But if you are NOT a darling of the Media...Your fuscked.

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 1:46 am
by haasd0gg
Ross Perot had more votes than people thought too. Its still not enough to get elected.

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 1:58 am
by MATTHEW'S_DAD
When did health care become a right to be guaranteed by the government? Lol, government intervention is what has it so screwed up now.

Re: Letting people with no health care die

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:31 am
by mrjamwin
Soylent Green that's where the world is headed. I guarantee you.