Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Do you seriously think they will not riot at the end of the trial? Also, do you understand the grand jury process at all? This case in particular, they were given everything, every piece of evidence to look at. It would've only took 9 of the 12 jurors to indict the officer, based on probable cause mind you, whereas a criminal trial would have to achieve 100% while utilizing beyond reasonable doubt.
No more making excuses for these people. The stepfather needs to be in jail for inciting a riot. The looters need to be pursued and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. The victims here are the local business owners who have no business now. These are good people in the town that are doing what they can for the locals by owning and maintaining a place of business, and these damn fools burn it down. Six months from now the locals will have to travel much further to go to a store because some professional agitators came in destroyed their town, meanwhile the professional agitators will be back at their hometown with everything still intact.
Here's the victims.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/201 ... -and-tearsOne more thing, if you send it to court every time a cop shoots someone, you will accomplish two things, you will clog up an already overloaded judicial system and you will cost the local municipality even more money by forcing them to go through an unnecessary process. And as a bonus you will have fewer people who are going to have that desire to be a cop and you will begin to either see a cop shortage or your quality level of cops is going to decline. There is already a process in place and it was utilized
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Ben Franklin