Page 1 of 7

{(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:12 am
by Hannibal
We've done a little expanding as of late and are eager for some nice semi-organized combat. If there's an interest we'd like to have an evening or two and do a little conquest. I'm not sure tournament would be the right world but either way. With a good week or so notice we could field 5-10 members. Unlike JOG we much much prefer conquest over HA. Let me know if there's an interst :gunsmilie:

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:23 am
by Doves
I would like to play in this.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 2:49 am
by RaptoR
Wouldn't last long lol

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:47 pm
by [JOG]WorldFear
I GO! :punk:

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 4:04 pm
by Ain't of Judgement
NO kidding! This is pathetic.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 4:07 pm
by [m'kay]
Yeah, wanting to play a video game with people is such a pathetic thing to do. Next thing you know, they might be friendly or something gross like that. For such a "phylosopher", you're pretty childish.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 4:47 pm
by Ain't of Judgement
[m'kay] wrote:Yeah, wanting to play a video game with people is such a pathetic thing to do. Next thing you know, they might be friendly or something gross like that. For such a "phylosopher", you're pretty childish.

I've got a reason to be. Also, I never said I'm a phylosopher pal. I said it is a pathetic proposal because I just know that only leggz could claim victory on it's own if it would be 1 vs 5, altough it do is tough when this 5 people aren't noobs.
Hanniball ik you would like to battle me but please forget me. I am not joining the tournament altough you want to.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 5:01 pm
by [m'kay]
Ain't of Judgement wrote:
[m'kay] wrote:Yeah, wanting to play a video game with people is such a pathetic thing to do. Next thing you know, they might be friendly or something gross like that. For such a "phylosopher", you're pretty childish.

I've got a reason to be. Also, I never said I'm a phylosopher pal. I said it is a pathetic proposal because I just know that only leggz could claim victory on it's own if it would be 1 vs 5, altough it do is tough when this 5 people aren't noobs.
Hanniball ik you would like to battle me but please forget me.


God damn if your ego isn't insufferable. You play a star wars game for fun, you're not some [m'kay] badass samurai roaming the plains of japanoland searching for your ~soul~. People like to play games together, and this is a game. Even if you are good at this game, that doesn't make you anything more than a nobody. And besides, compared to people who used to play in the past, you're probably really [poo] at this game anyways, so watching you stroke yourself off is even sadder than it already is.

Also, learn how to construct your [m'kay] sentences. I doubt anyone even knows what kind of inane chatter spews out of your mouth.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 5:37 pm
by Ain't of Judgement
I'm a proud kid. I am not even going to response on that message and I will never decrease myself to your level.
And you know what the coolest thing is? Despite I fully understand you and your actions against me, I am not going to give what you want. Does this made you astonished, disappointed and don't you understand? Maybe that's your punishment.

Re: {(SS)} vs (SWGO) Conquest Torny

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 5:53 pm
by [m'kay]
Hahaha, man, you're really pretentious. I could hardly care less, frankly. I'm just making it clear that the majority of people on these forums don't hinge their entire ego on how well they do at a video game, and a lot of us would like to play against SS for [poo] and giggles. Hell, i'd be down for it.