(SWGO)MinasThirith wrote:Intel gives more suport.
Is more stable.
Is more reliable.
And its a higher qualety.
AMD in this case is faster yet i prefer qualety over speed.
Intel gives no support becouse you will never need support for CPU.
Intel is not more stable.
Intel is not more reliable.
Intel is not higher quality.
AMD is not faster.
(SWGO)MinasThirith wrote:Back about 6 years ago i had an AMD sempron +3200 it was supossed to run at 1.2GHZ instead it was running at 1GHZ.
Thats 20% diffrence.
So you got a smart CPU with power control and you didnt like it ?
Btw, Sempron 3200+ used to run at stock speed of 1.8 GHz -
http://products.amd.com/(S(tvv5u2a3lutn1t3dy4qye345))/pages/DesktopCPUDetail.aspx?id=147&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=&f10=&f11=&f12=
(SWGO)MinasThirith wrote:Now im running an intel Q8200 Quad-core running at a technical 2.33GHZ yet whith no overclocking its working at 2.4GHZ thats 0.07GHZ faster per core than they say it does.
Now you got CPU that has not power control and you like it ?
toad wrote:I run both Intel and AMD for my business clients. By far I am a bigger fan of AMD on the desktop than Intel.
I use AMD for my home desktop and I don't think I will change to Intel any time soon.
But,... Phenom X4 is a joke. I say wait till the time to buy comes and decide then. I think the X6 Phenoms will be in your price tag by then.
Retired member of SWGO 2006~2011.