$50 million more wasted tax dollars

[fightingclam]

True, but I'd like to have a longer life, as opposed to having a shorter one.

Wow it always comes down to size. Well as I tell my friends who have this "problem"... It's not the length that ers, but what you do with it...

A 13- year old's options are pretty limited. Just until 25 rolls around. Then I'll be "ready" to die

[(SWGO)KT]

Anyway to sum it up the world is already [m'kay] for the future.

[toad]

Anyway to sum it up the world is already [m'kay] for the future.

The future is what you make of it....

[burzerker]

Here's some more money wasted on global warming fraud. http://nation.foxnews.com/global-warmin ... bear-fraud
Don't know how many more uncovered fraudulent reports it will take for people to open their eyes. And they say the big money comes from oil companies..lol.. what a joke.

If you are going to quote something then I would suggest you read the article.

Members of both sides, however, said that it was too early to make any pronouncements about the case, particularly since the agency has not yet released the details of the allegations against him....

Grifo said the allegations made in the complaint filed by Ruch's group are premature and said people should wait to see what, if anything, comes of the inspector general's investigation.

There is no debate about global warming, it is fact. The global temperatures are higher than they where ten years ago. If you want to blubber about the cause then fine. Just leave your smog pumping SUV at home because you really don't need a truck to cart your fat ass around.

No debate??? There is a list of more than 30000 actual scientists that say it isn't real. I say actual scientists because it's the IPCC that is made up of about a dozen actual scientists in it's large organization. One of the best know climate scientists in the US from MIT says it's bogus (Richard Lintzen) so if you really want to deny that there are people who disagree with the so called "global warming science" you should actually look into it. There has just been an article released FROM SCIENTISTS that uses NASA's own data to show that the earth isn't heating as the computer model's would show. When you have clowns like this guy that lied about polar bears drowning to drum up support for his trying to change the world and send us to live like people from the middle ages and who has his own wife be the "peer reviewer" of his data it's just another nail in the coffin of this hoax.

[toad]

30,00 scientist? Put Lindzen on a pedestal all you want, but I doubt you will find many to stand next to him. He has a point about climate alarmism, but that is about it. As for looking into it I have, there are big problems with global warming thesis. The science is sound but their predictions and interpretations are off. The ice caps are melting but the world hasn't imploded. If we continue the years to come will be interesting to say the least. Lastly peer reviews happen after you get your paper published. Other members of your area of study look at and comment on your paper. So his wife ,while interesting, would not constitute a peer review