Well since i'm feeling down today i decided to finally post the why i don't believe in the big bang theory nor the evolution theory
Well to start off, the earth's dimencions are approximatly 40.000KM wich in space is nothing, if the earth would be around 4000KM bigger the gravity would increase so much that the earth would slowly move closer to the sun every year since it would go out of it's course...life would be imposible.
However if the earth would be around 3000KM smaller it's gravity would be too low and we would move away from the sun....and freeze to death.
Now if the earth would be around 5000KM closer of further to/from the sun life would be imposible.
The earth spins it's own dimencion once every 24 hours...if this would be longer or shorter one side would burn and the other side would freeze...life would be quite imposible.
There are of course much more things i could name here, like the magnetic field, and the atmosphere as well as the ozone layer...
To come to this i cannot believe that some explosion in space was able to put the earth in the position it currently is, with the exact right size traveling at the right speed with the right gravity, as well as the only discovered planet with an ozone layer on wich life can exist.
Even tough this could all be a cooincidence i do not believe so much luck is posible....
However the second part is more logic then the first..
About the Evolution theory....
cience as well as many religions believe the earth started off as a crust, a more or less rock with explosions vulcanos etc.
Now cience believes that after some time of changes a cel came to be of wich spawned life, okay so far.
Now can anyone tell me how the heck it is posible to get a biological life from a chemical reaction? as the earth was a crust with explosions lava etc...i really would like to know how chemical reactions can create a biological response...since modern cience hasn't prooven this.
Imagen this did somehow happen..
Imagen a cel came to be out of nothing, simple evolution.
Now there are 2 types of base cels, the ones with a core, and the ones without it.
The cels without a core do not come to be inteligent life, wich now creates bacteria and such, however cells with a core create inteligent life AKA humans come off cels with a core.
Now please tell me if cience believes life started with a cel without a core, then how is it posible that a coreless cel is able to somehow evolve into a cel with a core, and that this cel with a core is able to sustain a inteligent life form as complex as a human.
Modern cience HASN'T Prooven in any way this is posible.
Besides this, humans are supposed to be [well manicured man] sapiens like cience discribes them, so we are mamells and just inteligent animals...well i can get this logic besides the point where we don't act like animals.
Meaning we pollute the earth we live in, a dog doesn't take a dump in his house by figuere of speach, an animals do not reason, do not think, they work on an instinct, we are the only life form on this blue marble that doesn't.
We use animals for testing, the point being that humans do not act like animals, our brain is nothing related to them, also cientists discovered that both our bodies and our brains are made to last forever, while the bodies and brains of animals aren't...furthermore cientists cannot explain why after the third cycle we start dying...
The cycles are points in our life where our blood as well as our cells renew, this happens 3 times after we are born and not more.
This happens every 7 years so, at the age of 7, 14 and 21, remarkable that when we reach 28 the cells would need to be renewed and it doesn't happen for some reason...odder still that from that time people start getting weaker, start having back problems etc...
I could name much more things but i think this post will be quite big enough already...soon people will call me "dread "
MT