Ranking system...

[(SWGO)SirPepsi]

Hello comrades,
I have a suugestion that we should try to have a ranking system in SWGO. Another clan, IGF, has this system and it makes the clan get bigger and organizied. If we think about the idea, can I have dibs on Lieutenant General??

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

[fightingclam]

Hello comrades,
I have a suugestion that we should try to have a ranking system in SWGO. Another clan, IGF, has this system and it makes the clan get bigger and organizied. If we think about the idea, can I have dibs on Lieutenant General??

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

Well, I mean, I guess.....

[fightingclam]

[quote="[SWGO]hadrian"]Hello comrades,
[\quote]

Demotivational_pictures_in_Soviet_Russia_in_soviet_russia-s600x480-55917-580.jpg (132.68 KiB) Viewed 1370 times

[WD-40]

Hello comrades,
I have a suugestion that we should try to have a ranking system in SWGO. Another clan, IGF, has this system and it makes the clan get bigger and organizied. If we think about the idea, can I have dibs on Lieutenant General??

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

WTF is this???
You gonna buy an Army uniform for your rank insignia?
Gee…I always wanted to be called 'General WD'!…I feel so giddy inside just thinking about it!

(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*

1 to 4 Star Generals are 1-Brigadier General, 2-Major General, 3-Lieutenant General and 4-General. Therefore, 'Medium' Admins will need to be referred to as 'Wannabe Generals'.

(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

Tell ya what, now I feel 'motivated' to have a drink! Then I'm gonna Tea-Bag Hadrian next time I see him! Cheers!

[haasd0gg]

How about you two just rank each other?

[Commander Sparrow]

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

Right, what the actual [m'kay]?

Does anyone here find most of this guys posts to be completely annoying? You can just say "Yeh i agree wit dis [poo]" and be done with it.

What ranking structure would we even follow, US Army, USAF, USMC or what?

Signed Sincerely,
AgentSmith_#38

[(SWGO)SirPepsi]

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

Right, what the actual [m'kay]?

Does anyone here find most of this guys posts to be completely annoying? You can just say "Yeh i agree wit dis [poo]" and be done with it.

What ranking structure would we even follow, US Army, USAF, USMC or what?

Signed Sincerely,
AgentSmith_#38

I guess you are entitled to your opinion... However, I DID provide the structure in my post, just sayin'. Also, how is the post annoying!? It's not like you are forced to read it or something!

[Duel of Fates]

I say we should adopt Starfleet Command rankings. That way we could see Uranus.

[Commander Sparrow]

I endorse this proposal almost whole-heartedly! I think it would be a nice idea.

The only concerns I would have are:

(1) Some people might feel sad and left-out if hey remain a low-rank for a while
(2) It creates a lot of friction between members. This community might then be turned into an anarchy with everyone vying for the top position.

My reasons for supporting this measure:

(1) Creates healthy competition between friendly people
(2) Motivates members to be active in their community

IF we do adopt this idea:
(1) Matt-Chicago-- General of the Army*
(2) Senior Admins, respected by all (this would require a vote)-- 1-4 Star Generals*
(3) Medium Admins (again, a vote)-- Brigadier General, Major general, or Lieutenant General*
(4) Lesser Admins (again, again, a vote)-- Lieutenant Colonel or Colonel*
(5) Respected Community Members (Including me! :D)-- Captain or Major*
(6) Moderately Respected Members-- Second Lieutenant and Lieutenant*
(7) Lesser Community Members-- Corporal or Sergeant*
(8) N00bs-- Private or Private First-Class*

*Or whatever we decide to call the ranks

Right, what the actual [m'kay]?

Does anyone here find most of this guys posts to be completely annoying? You can just say "Yeh i agree wit dis [poo]" and be done with it.

What ranking structure would we even follow, US Army, USAF, USMC or what?

Signed Sincerely,
AgentSmith_#38

I guess you are entitled to your opinion... However, I DID provide the structure in my post, just sayin'. Also, how is the post annoying!? It's not like you are forced to read it or something!

You posted an annoying wall of text in light blue on a crappy thread after Matt declined the suggestion - pretty [m'kay] pointless, same goes for this thread. Oh and I didn't read every bit of it 'cause it looked like a load of bollocks.

[(SWGO)SirPepsi]

You posted an annoying wall of text in light blue on a crappy thread after Matt declined the suggestion - pretty [m'kay] pointless, same goes for this thread. Oh and I didn't read every bit of it 'cause it looked like a load of bollocks.

Whoah! I'm sorry if I offended you! But calm down seriously. This is a light-hearted forum, not some place where we attack each other just for the sake of it! We are a community, and yes, you are entitled to your opinions, but then again, so am I. You are not any better than I am!