Why MT doesn't believe in this.

[THEWULFMAN]

Darwin is still a coke head...did you study that too?..All jokes aside....Evolution is a joke....I'm supposed to believe in countless "coincidences"? The astronamical chances of random incidents happening at the right time, during "ideal" conditions? If science has so much knowledge of this why have they not recreated it?.....In theory, we should by right be God's ourselves....recreate life from nothing.

[Yanoda]

Darwin is still a coke head...did you study that too?..All jokes aside....Evolution is a joke....I'm supposed to believe in countless "coincidences"? The astronamical chances of random incidents happening at the right time, during "ideal" conditions? If science has so much knowledge of this why have they not recreated it?.....In theory, we should by right be God's ourselves....recreate life from nothing.

On what basis do you have to use insults on an individual that laid the ground work for Modern Biology? Do you have evidence to back up your claim?
Define coincidences. Evolution of Life undergoes a process called Reproduction, Mutation, and Natural/Artificial Selection. I wouldn't necessarily call this coincidences.
What astronomical coincidences? Have you read any previous posts? Scientists (incl. many Astronomers) found organic compounds in Asteroids/Comets and on Mars, seems your claims of astronomical chances is baseless.
Scientists did recreate organic compounds (Amino Acids) using non-organic compounds (CO2, H2O etc.) via The Miller-Urey Experiment, another baseless claim.
Now so? God has different definitions FYI. Also, by saying that we should be considered Gods just because we were able to recreate organic compounds and modify cells would imply that your conception (how you wrote your sentence) God (Deity) was only able to create life and not the Universe. That would imply that another being (Deity) must have been there to create the Universe and imply Polytheism (which most, if not all, current religions originated from).
So I ask you, what do you consider more viable? A several thousand year old Book/Belief that was written/conceived by humans, is easily misinterpreted and was modified over the course of History or A Scientific Theory (do not confuse it with Hypothesis) that has undergone 200 years of study and providing valid evidence (DNA & Fossil Mapping, observed cellular mutations etc.) of the process(es) of Evolution of Life?

Despite me having an assumption that you're trolling, I made an effort in addressing your argument/claim.

@THEWULFMAN
You love making these pics don't ya?

Cheers

Yanoda

[haasd0gg]

I'm supposed to believe in countless "coincidences"? The astronamical chances of random incidents happening at the right time, during "ideal" conditions? If science has so much knowledge of this why have they not recreated it?.....In theory, we should by right be God's ourselves....recreate life from nothing.

Your parents had sex and created you. It had to be ideal circumstances for that to happen. Your life was created from nothing, essentially (unless you count dinner and too much wine).
How about the countless coincidences that let this occur? If one denominator from that night changed, you may have been a stain rather that a baby...

Juuuuust saying....

[IJO sha-quan-jone]

no one is mentioning that right before Darwin died he said that everything he said was wrong and he made it all up.

[WD-40]

no one is mentioning that right before Darwin died he said that everything he said was wrong and he made it all up.

'Deathbed confession'…Nice!

[Mandalore]

As Richard Dawkins says, I'm going to have to have a tape recorder by my bed side when I die so that my enemies don't conspire against me in death.

One would think that if he admitted it all on his death bed, his son wouldn't have spent his life defending Evolution, and finally being able to disprove Lord Kalvin's notion that evolution had to be ruled out for lack of time (At this time it was believed the Sun was a natural fire, not a nuclear development) with the discovery of some element, I forget what it is. I think it starts with a T....

[Darth Crater]

no one is mentioning that right before Darwin died he said that everything he said was wrong and he made it all up.

Nobody is mentioning that because it was not a thing that happened. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hope.html (no clue about the trustworthiness of the website itself, but it cites a primary source here)

[11_Panama_]

Darwin is still a coke head...did you study that too?..All jokes aside....Evolution is a joke....I'm supposed to believe in countless "coincidences"? The astronamical chances of random incidents happening at the right time, during "ideal" conditions? If science has so much knowledge of this why have they not recreated it?.....In theory, we should by right be God's ourselves....recreate life from nothing.

On what basis do you have to use insults on an individual that laid the ground work for Modern Biology? Do you have evidence to back up your claim?
Define coincidences. Evolution of Life undergoes a process called Reproduction, Mutation, and Natural/Artificial Selection. I wouldn't necessarily call this coincidences.
What astronomical coincidences? Have you read any previous posts? Scientists (incl. many Astronomers) found organic compounds in Asteroids/Comets and on Mars, seems your claims of astronomical chances is baseless.
Scientists did recreate organic compounds (Amino Acids) using non-organic compounds (CO2, H2O etc.) via The Miller-Urey Experiment, another baseless claim.
Now so? God has different definitions FYI. Also, by saying that we should be considered Gods just because we were able to recreate organic compounds and modify cells would imply that your conception (how you wrote your sentence) God (Deity) was only able to create life and not the Universe. That would imply that another being (Deity) must have been there to create the Universe and imply Polytheism (which most, if not all, current religions originated from).
So I ask you, what do you consider more viable? A several thousand year old Book/Belief that was written/conceived by humans, is easily misinterpreted and was modified over the course of History or A Scientific Theory (do not confuse it with Hypothesis) that has undergone 200 years of study and providing valid evidence (DNA & Fossil Mapping, observed cellular mutations etc.) of the process(es) of Evolution of Life?

Despite me having an assumption that you're trolling, I made an effort in addressing your argument/claim.

@THEWULFMAN
You love making these pics don't ya?

Cheers

Yanoda

Uhmm, I fail to see where I delibaretly insulted somebody...was it "did you study that too"?....because if thats what it is....that was not an insult, it was sarcassm, and to be honest here, I meant it more as a joke. Who would get offended at being asked if theyre a scholar? Did I call him a moron?...as he did with the caricature that he posted as a response to my opinion? No, I did not insult anybody....I wrote what I belived in and I get "ganged on " by his friends. What is it with people that cant handle someone else's opinions? Why must they attack? I posted my believes and now I have to justify myself to some of you....sorry but I wont. I dont "troll", and I dont post anything looking for a fight...please dont misunderstand me...and do what I do....if you dont like the post..dont respond.

[11_Panama_]

I'm supposed to believe in countless "coincidences"? The astronamical chances of random incidents happening at the right time, during "ideal" conditions? If science has so much knowledge of this why have they not recreated it?.....In theory, we should by right be God's ourselves....recreate life from nothing.

Your parents had sex and created you. It had to be ideal circumstances for that to happen. Your life was created from nothing, essentially (unless you count dinner and too much wine).
How about the countless coincidences that let this occur? If one denominator from that night changed, you may have been a stain rather that a baby...

Juuuuust saying....

Haasd0gg...two people making a baby is far from being out of nothing. The woman supplies the egg, the man supplies the sperm..thats hardly nothing. My point being...I havent heard of scientists making another human being from a dish and some amino acids and protein strands. Thats what I meant when I said "out of nothing".

[Hobo]

Making anything out of nothing is impossible. If yall think about it you will know it to be true.

@Panama
When you say you don't believe in evolution, do you mean: The scientific theory of the origin of species of plants and animals?