by MATTHEW'S_DAD » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:51 pm
"This is even less factual than your first sentence. If you want to play Monday morning QB, then I can do the same....had I been in that crowd with my daily carry weapon, that dude would have a hole in his head." And this is not an assumption/exaggeration? - same as yours
"Don't worry, most criminals have their own version of concealed carry and guess what, they don't have to do any paperwork or pay any fees." My point exactly; gun laws are much too lax. - so we let the government pass more laws that only punish the law abiding citizen and strip us of more and more freedoms? That's a terrible idea.
"This is your assumption, not a fact, so we can toss that remark in the trash." Well, yes...it is an assumption. But it wasn't intended to be a statement of indisputable fact. I provided speculation on why after that sentence. - So like said, toss this exchange in the trash.
"People must set aside their anger and grief to think clearly" "But they don't. I refer you to the wolf/sheep and sheepdog relationship. The wolves will NEVER go away. NEVER. Listen to this word......."NEVER". That's just how it is, welcome to the world." I have no idea what you're talking about here. I was referring to the demand for overt carry laws and subsequently, laxer gun laws. The comparison, relating to your example, would be that the sheepdogs are not thinking clearly; their "solution" would only exacerbate the problem. - Sorry, I assumed you were refering to the bad guys here. But nonetheless, you are correct, we must set aside anger and grief and think clearly which means they don't need to pass anymore kneejerk laws.
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Ben Franklin