by Duel of Fates » Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:55 am
Well Sam, I waited a couple of days for your definition of "permanent apocalypse". Since you are unwilling, or unable to respond, I will make it as clear as I can. eg. Katrina wiped out whole neighborhoods in New Orleans and the surrounding areas. The people who died, or were never seen again and presumed dead would consider that to be a permanent apocalypse. Nothing is more permanent than death. Those that were stranded without food, clean water, electricity, police services, and medical assistance had to make do with what they had, which, with most of them was not a whole hell of a lot. Many more died in the days that followed due to exhaustion, dehydration, and exposure to the heat. This is just one example of people not prepared for the worst case scenario.
Whether the disaster comes in the shape of a hurricane, twister, blizzard, drought, electrical black out, earthquake, tsunami, terrorist attack, financial collapse, etc., being prepared is the best solution. Relying on government to come in and protect you, clothe you, feed you, and provide security is foolishness. In a major disaster, it can take weeks for help to arrive. Having a plan, an escape route, or even bottling water is better than nothing.
I don't mind that you find it silly. What you do if, God forbid, disaster strikes is entirely up to you. If you think it is stupid to prepare, that is your right. But scoffing at those that do wish to prepare for possible threats is childish, and I have seen nothing in your arguments to disuade the rationality of being prepared.