Yanoda wrote:MATTHEW'S_DAD wrote:if the roles were reversed and there was a Republican admin in the White House, do you believe there would've been more coverage from the press or less coverage or about the same?
Recent history seems to indicate less coverage for a Republican President.
that's playing with half truths, and here's why. Liberals love to accuse Republican Presidents of just about anything, especially if they have little or no truth. Then they scream about what he is getting away with. I love the liberal rant of "what did he know and when did he know it????" That same rule does not apply to liberal presidents...its inevitably a with hunt, or the famous racist accusation.
Hell, we will never know obamas education, medical history, transcripts.....it took forever to get a half assed forged birth document from his party. You know,,,the one that shows his certificate number that is numerically lower than the twins that were born before him.
In any even the answer is a resounding no. The media is not the media it once was...look how fast they turned on Bob Woodward, their hero from the 70's!!!
Take the abortion trial in Philadelphia...lowest media coverage ever. But I bet the AP is pissed how fast their master did them dirty. But it will only be a short amount of time before they are carrying obamas koolaid once more.