swgohome.com

by **Centurion** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:14 am

Although it goes against my preference of Sides, I employ the tactics of Ulysses S. Grant. For the large amount of kills I get it seems to add up on my Death ratio. But being at the top is more important than a ratio. I say get to the top of the server list first, then worry about ratio.

by **Corpse** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:46 pm

Centurion wrote:Although it goes against my preference of Sides, I employ the tactics of Ulysses S. Grant. For the large amount of kills I get it seems to add up on my Death ratio. But being at the top is more important than a ratio. I say get to the top of the server list first, then worry about ratio.

I say have fun and score doesn't matt

er.

by **Admiral_Aeka** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:58 pm

Corpse wrote:I say have fun and score doesn't er.

by **Draigun** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:57 am

Yes there are days were I just liked to have fun and not care about score. But some other days I prefer to get great scores.

by **Jango_Fred** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:21 am

Damn "Red" mathematics

MATTHEW'S_DAD wrote:
Jango_Fred wrote:Here is an issue that has eluded this discussion so far... the kill/death ratio is literally the number of kills divided by the number of deaths, so from a mathematical sense, if you don't die, your k/d ratio is undefined.

commie

by **Talon Karrde** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:01 pm

Draigun wrote:So in the afternoon on HA, I got this score:

This is basically saying that I didn't die at all, while maintaining kills pretty well. So, is this probably a record or did someone get like 35 kills and 0 deaths?

Well the thing is, the only person on the other team that would give you any challenge in that would be Out for War. Fodder I say!

by **Draigun** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Talon Karrde wrote:
Draigun wrote:So in the afternoon on HA, I got this score:

This is basically saying that I didn't die at all, while maintaining kills pretty well. So, is this probably a record or did someone get like 35 kills and 0 deaths?

Well the thing is, the only person on the other team that would give you any challenge in that would be Out for War. Fodder I say!

Actually I am not sure if he could even compete with me. I am very skilled in the ways of the force, and non-force. Someone who is good at both has essential tools in order to efficiently master the concepts of the game.

Darickus himself has skill in force and no force. You could think of it this way: Darickus and I, when put together as a team, are inexorable.

by **Corpse** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:07 pm

And I say:

Noobrevenge + Afrosamurai > Drai + Dari.

by **Draigun** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:59 pm

Corpse wrote:And I say:

Noobrevenge + Afrosamurai > Drai + Dari.

If they push, no. If they pull, yes. If they try to do no force, NO.

They are only good at pulling, making them weak in any other field. Technically, we could still own them as heroes when they are villians. So, they are very powerful in the ways of pulling, but that is it. In conclusion, we are better because we (Dari and I) are decent at pulling, while maintaining our other fields (no force, pushing, chocking etc.)