2012 US Presidential Election

Post spam, politics, funny things, personal stories, whatever you want. Please remain respectful of all individuals regardless of their views!

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Mandalore » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:18 am

If anything Obama is probably a closet Atheist, as that was what his father was and he didn't "find" Jesus until his 20s...after he decided he wanted a political career from the looks of it.
[04:25] -SR-Mandalore: who pitches and who catches
[04:29] (SWGO)SWINE*FLU: We'll do it in turns.
[04:30] -SR-Mandalore: That sounds super fair
[04:30] -SR-Mandalore: Do you think other gay couples do that?
[04:30] (SWGO)SWINE*FLU: I reckon so.

COMMANDER OTTO:
and you come with the name Mandalore... really CREATIVE.
BY COMMANDER OTTO
Mandalore
Community Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 am

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby The Master » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:45 am

I'm pretty sure I know what we'll be studying in school the next few months.
Doctors Fear Me
The Master
Community Member
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Outrider » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:58 am

Darth Crater wrote:Which change will cause that to happen? It doesn't obviously follow from anything I've seen so far, and it's not listed among the downsides on that website.

There's a hyperlink that says Impact of Obamacare right under the tenth con. Its impact on doctors will be listed on the resulting page.

As for the religion and/or level of tolerance towards any religions of a President goes, I don't think it should be of any concern at all, as long as they don't have an influence over anything government related. Per the First Amendment, of course.
User avatar
Outrider
Community Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:43 am

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby WD-40 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:50 pm

Darth Crater wrote:Thanks. So...

-Everyone has the ability to get health insurance.
-Not getting disqualified for pre-existing conditions (as I mentioned I have a friend who benefits from this).
-I'm able to be covered by my parents' health insurance for the next five years if necessary.
-People who already have insurance shouldn't see anything change, though there may be disturbances in prices or a need to switch plans.
-Tax increases and penalties associated with it only apply to the rich or incompetent (respectively), and create a net income for the government.

As far as I can tell the downsides are perfectly reasonable for an act with this much benefit.

What you left out, is that Obama deliberately didn't say that he was robbing your parents (and us) of Medicare in the amount of 700 Billion dollars to jump start Obamacare, which will end up costing far more than that (in the trillions by 2025)...effectively ending Medicare and bankrupting the US even further.

Do you think Obama has thought out that far how to pay for it? Or if he even cares? Of course he hasn't! He just doesn't care! He is a Political Amateur and a hack! He just wants to ram the pet programs thru congress that align with his Progressive beliefs. Saving our economy is not a priority. That's why he went for Obamacare first while he had both houses of Congress in his pocket. He believes we should all downsize in wealth, spread it around, sing comb-ayah and give in to the glorious master design of his twisted belief system. He deliberately 'lied' to get elected the first time, because he knew he couldn't get elected on his true progressive beliefs, and he is attacking Romney and Ryan to get re-elected because he cannot run on his amateur progressive failed record.

GAWD! Didn't you see Pelosi give a talk where she was quoted as saying to constituents when asked what exactly was 'in' the Obamacare package before she passed it thru Congress? "We have to 'pass' this Bill, before we can actually know what's in it." How [m'kay] up is that??!! She's from California, and I know for a fact California is filled with [m'kay] up voters! That's why idiots like her are still in Congress. It's a sham that California gets 1/4th of the total electorate votes needed to elect a president.

As far as Obama's religion, I don't think even he knows. He studied the Koran (that's been verified). He went to church (verified). He went to a church (led by the wacko) because of it's political connections to high-rolling church members in Chicago. It's all mapped out. Read the book! Anyway...off my soapbox.
User avatar
WD-40
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 4537
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Likely on some crappy Hotel internet connection
Xfire: faststart0777

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby ProfessorDreadNaught » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:41 pm

Darth Crater wrote:Thanks. So...

-Everyone has the ability to get health insurance.
-Not getting disqualified for pre-existing conditions (as I mentioned I have a friend who benefits from this).
-I'm able to be covered by my parents' health insurance for the next five years if necessary.
-People who already have insurance shouldn't see anything change, though there may be disturbances in prices or a need to switch plans.
-Tax increases and penalties associated with it only apply to the rich or incompetent (respectively), and create a net income for the government.

As far as I can tell the downsides are perfectly reasonable for an act with this much benefit.


Why do people want health insurance?

Isn't health care what people want ?

Why do we muddy the waters of this debate with health insurance?

Cause you grabass pussyboy babies are too afraid to ask for what you really want; Free medical treatment for anything and everything that ails ya. You can't get away with "Free healthcare for all" or "Government paid for Healthcare" so you say "Insurance should pay for it. That's what insurance is for right?" WRONG!

Anybody who believes that Obamacare or ANY health insurance program that isn't market driven can work are the same idiots who think the American government can continue to spend more and more each year indefinitely by borrowing from foreign investors. You are stupid, should not be allowed to hold office or even vote.

I'm sorry Crater, but people with your attitude towards getting something for free sickens me. You don't know or care where that something comes from. You've become accustomed to expecting things handed to you. {Retch!}

If you came to me for a job interview I'd hire an illegal Mexican and pay him TWICE as much!

We need a cultural revolution in this country that eradicates any sense of entitlement from our people and instead imbues a resilience and determination to make ones own way in this world. A work ethic that restores value to our currency and faith in our economy. A return of pride in American achievement and progress based on hard work and continuing improvement.

The personalities in this election be damned. At election time you have to ask, which choice will aim towards a solution and which to more of the same.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
"Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing."
ProfessorDreadNaught
Community Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Outrider » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:50 pm

WD-40 wrote:GAWD! Didn't you see Pelosi give a talk where she was quoted as saying to constituents when asked what exactly was 'in' the Obamacare package before she passed it thru Congress? "We have to 'pass' this Bill, before we can actually know what's in it." How [m'kay] up is that??!!

Here's the full context of that sound bite: http://www.speaker.gov/op-ed/obamacare- ... -op-ed-wsj

It's not as what you're making it out to be. Also, the bill was available for online viewing prior to that vote back in 2010 for all who actually cared to know what it encompasses.
WD-40 wrote:She's from California, and I know for a fact California is filled with [m'kay] up voters! That's why idiots like her are still in Congress. It's a sham that California gets 1/4th of the total electorate votes needed to elect a president.

I don't think it's fair to lump all Californians together like that. Nancy Pelosi was only one of 40+ congressmen from California back in the day, and only residents from her district(s) could have elected her to represent them. As for her becoming Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, etc., that selection process was done in the House, not by Californians. And it's only fair that California gets an equal representation of electoral votes since it is a very populous state after all. Rather than blame California, it is the Electoral College itself that is flawed.
User avatar
Outrider
Community Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:43 am

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby WD-40 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:28 pm

Outrider wrote:It's not as what you're making it out to be. Also, the bill was available for online viewing prior to that vote back in 2010 for all who actually cared to know what it encompasses..

For all but those in Congress to read you mean. She sure didn't know what it said!
WD-40 wrote:She's from California, and I know for a fact California is filled with [m'kay] up voters! That's why idiots like her are still in Congress. It's a sham that California gets 1/4th of the total electorate votes needed to elect a president.

Outrider wrote:I don't think it's fair to lump all Californians together like that. Nancy Pelosi was only one of 40+ congressmen from California back in the day, and only residents from her district(s) could have elected her to represent them. As for her becoming Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, etc., that selection process was done in the House, not by Californians. And it's only fair that California gets an equal representation of electoral votes since it is a very populous state after all. Rather than blame California, it is the Electoral College itself that is flawed.

I know she is one of MANY Congressionals for CA...that's obvious. Read what I said. I said CA is FILLED with [m'kay] up voters...(not all) Yes, I agree, the electoral college is flawed. It should be by Popular vote.
User avatar
WD-40
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 4537
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Likely on some crappy Hotel internet connection
Xfire: faststart0777

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Outrider » Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:41 pm

WD-40 wrote:For all but those in Congress to read you mean. She sure didn't know what it said!

She did, and they all did, although not fully aquainted, that is if you are familiar with the process of how a new bill is introduced. The original context of that statement was:
You’ve heard about the controversies within the bill, the process about the bill, one or the other. But I don’t know if you have heard that it is legislation for the future, not just about health care for America, but about a healthier America, where preventive care is not something that you have to pay a deductible for or out of pocket. Prevention, prevention, prevention—it’s about diet, not diabetes. It’s going to be very, very exciting. But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.

And that was 2010. At least we all now know in 2012 what the bill is all about.
WD-40 wrote:I know she is one of MANY Congressionals for CA...that's obvious. Read what I said. I said CA is FILLED with [m'kay] up voters...(not all) Yes, I agree, the electoral college is flawed. It should be by Popular vote.

I did read what you wrote. I was clarifying what I interpreted. You just made seem as though all voters from California, most of which are incompetent, according to you, were responsible for putting Nancy Pelosi, an idiot, again, according to you, in the governmental position she was and is in now.

You also mentioned that there are other idiots, Democrat or Republican, in Congress, some of which, Democrats, were responsible for Pelosi's selection as Speaker of the House, Minority House Leader, etc. So how did all of these other Congressmen affiliated with the Democratic Party who are supposedly idiots get elected? Surely, not all of them are Californian and not every single one from California is an idiot. This must mean that the other sources of these idiotic, Democratic Congressmen are other states, and they were elected by incompetent voters in their individual state districts. In conclusion, incompetent voters can be found everywhere in the U.S., as well as idiotic Congressmen, regardless of political party affiliation. Sorry for the tangent. I just needed to defend California, being a Californian myself.
User avatar
Outrider
Community Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:43 am

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Stranger » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:50 am

ProfessorDreadNaught wrote:
Darth Crater wrote:Thanks. So...

-Everyone has the ability to get health insurance.
-Not getting disqualified for pre-existing conditions (as I mentioned I have a friend who benefits from this).
-I'm able to be covered by my parents' health insurance for the next five years if necessary.
-People who already have insurance shouldn't see anything change, though there may be disturbances in prices or a need to switch plans.
-Tax increases and penalties associated with it only apply to the rich or incompetent (respectively), and create a net income for the government.

As far as I can tell the downsides are perfectly reasonable for an act with this much benefit.


Why do people want health insurance?

Isn't health care what people want ?

Why do we muddy the waters of this debate with health insurance?

Cause you grabass pussyboy babies are too afraid to ask for what you really want; Free medical treatment for anything and everything that ails ya. You can't get away with "Free healthcare for all" or "Government paid for Healthcare" so you say "Insurance should pay for it. That's what insurance is for right?" WRONG!

Anybody who believes that Obamacare or ANY health insurance program that isn't market driven can work are the same idiots who think the American government can continue to spend more and more each year indefinitely by borrowing from foreign investors. You are stupid, should not be allowed to hold office or even vote.

I'm sorry Crater, but people with your attitude towards getting something for free sickens me. You don't know or care where that something comes from. You've become accustomed to expecting things handed to you. {Retch!}

If you came to me for a job interview I'd hire an illegal Mexican and pay him TWICE as much!

We need a cultural revolution in this country that eradicates any sense of entitlement from our people and instead imbues a resilience and determination to make ones own way in this world. A work ethic that restores value to our currency and faith in our economy. A return of pride in American achievement and progress based on hard work and continuing improvement.

The personalities in this election be damned. At election time you have to ask, which choice will aim towards a solution and which to more of the same.


DAMN GOOD statment. Now if only we could get rid of things like welfare and affimtive action. Now I understand SOME people need welfare but most ppeople on it dont need it or could get a job, BUT most of those people think "I don't have to work I can just get welfare." People expecting government hand outs is DISGUSTING.
Stranger
Community Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:42 am

Re: 2012 US Presidential Election

Postby Darth Crater » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:03 am

... You realize you are advocating to let segments of our population starve, and stop correcting for the latent racism and sexism remaining in our society?
User avatar
Darth Crater
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:26 pm
Xfire: darthcrater1016

PreviousNext

Return to Non-Game Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests

cron