Darth Crater wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by "making progress". I can list a string of my arguments which you have completely ignored, and which I am therefore forced to assume you do not dispute, in favor of semantics about "faith". I suppose I can call that progress.
Me thinks I struck a nerveCol. Homestar wrote: We can debate the validity of the bible next if you like.
Sure. A book, demonstrably written by humans, which some consider to provide evidence for a deity's existence because they have failed to notice the circular logic involved (God exists because the Bible says so, the Bible is true because God created it). Done.
Oops epic Bible fail. That wasn't a serious argument so I'll give it a half hearted argument. Circle broken - God exist because creation says so, the Bible is true because it's a book written over the course of human history with prophecies that came true. 66 books penned by 40 different men but never contradicts itself because it was written under divine inspiration. Valuable wisdom for us today even though last book written over 1900 years ago.... I could totally go on.Col. Homestar wrote:Because the belief in God is based on the evidence and our common sense approach that all creation from the vast universe to the smaller but no less important strands of DNA
This is not even a proper sentence. I can't tell if you meant something along the lines of "all was created" or "all creation is equally important". In any case, I have seen no evidence from your side of the debate, merely your pointing out a few gaps in our current knowledge. All of these either have more evidence for competing hypotheses than they do for yours, or have no evidence at all. In none of these cases should you be favoring a god, unless your worldview is simply that divorced from reality.
A few gaps?! I would hardly call the origin of the universe a gap Also the theory of evolution ABSOLUTLY involves the universe because evolution is life occurring without God if you insist there is no God you must account for everything not just human life.Col. Homestar wrote:You cling to this idea that everything you believe in is based on scientific fact, but as I have been pointing out (things I spent time researching that you have yet to respond to) the theory of evolution CANNOT provide a solid iron clad answer for what began the process of 1. The universe 2. Life of any kind on earth 3. The existence of human life as we know it today
Why are you once again:
-talking about "evolution" without clarifying whether or not you include abiogenesis? If you include it it satisfies 2 and 3, if you don't it satisfies 3 and abiogenesis separately satisfies 2.
-Connecting "evolution" with the origin of the universe, which is not even in the same field of study?
See above
-Continuously bringing up points like this which I have refuted previously, and which you have provided no counterarguments to support?
What points?
I can understand lack of knowledge. I cannot forgive utter failure to learn.
Failure to agree to your beliefs
By the way, the comment about 666 was mentioned because it has relevance to religion in popular culture. No "worry" anywhere.
If I truly thought you were worried I'd go into a long part about numerology.