Obama the Post Turtle

Post spam, politics, funny things, personal stories, whatever you want. Please remain respectful of all individuals regardless of their views!

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby ProfessorDreadNaught » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:22 pm

MC, Sorry, but you are an idiot.
Matt-Chicago wrote:"It's amusing but ultimately sad reading the immature and discredited objectivist nonsense which has been denounced and renounced by all but the most ideologically idealistic and foolish. Most young subscribers to Ayn Rand's reprehensible nonsense get over it by the time they graduate college - as they should.

For those here who don't know about objectivism - it's basically a philosophy which glorifies individualism, selfishness, greed, and abhors altruism or basically trying to do or plan anything for the benefit of others or society as a whole."


What you failed to realize about objectivism and the philosophies that it espouses, is that it glorifies the people in this world that use their minds to produce. It recognizes that some people are better than others and in varying degrees from superstars in their fields to sheep who need to go through life being led around and punch a clock everyday. Objectivism describes how these men should behave in our ideal society.

The other thing you fail to understand is the difference between "Society" and "Government." The Government is the weapon a society wields against individuals. A society is a group of people acting together for mutual benefit. There are people in our society who do NOT act properly for the benefit of society. Our founders realized this and tried to limit the weapon these individuals could use against society and its members. Much of the writing surrounding objectivism tries to dispel the illusions the wrong-headed people weave to disguise immoral actions as reasonable and benevolent help and support.

Matt-Chicago wrote:This is what generations of Americans have struggled for and what is currently being taken away and for what? So the people with all the wealth and power can get even more wealth and power. Because five vacation houses are better than four even if it means the elderly eating cat food and corpses rotting in the streets.


No one (not even objectivists and Tea Party members) thinks grandma should eat cat food or that a laid off worker should become destitute. Objectivist recognize the immorality of forcing someone to labor to fix those situations. Altruists are too happy to grab a whip and crack it at his fellow man to make him buy grandma a meal or help pay the laid off workers mortgage. Objectivism does NOT preclude it's followers from giving to grandma or the unemployed. It simply says it that it is immoral to be compelled to do so.

What the altruists want is people to be charitable and don't trust anyone to be that way so they crack the government whip and steal from their fellow man to give to another. They don't even have the guts to recognize themselves as thieves. They point to the good that the blood money has done and accept all the thanks and praise RIGHTFULLY due to the person the money was stolen from. That is how the religion of Government is created and sustained.

Matt-Chicago wrote:The issue is that you can still have a government and society which guarantees some standard of living for its citizens regardless of wealth, power, ability, or other personal circumstances and still leave plenty for the market. Guaranteeing that everyone has access to health care will not hurt entrepreneurism, nor will a guaranteed paltry retirement like social security, nor will assistance to poor families, nor will regulations to protect workers, consumers, and the environment.


Let's see if I can adjust your statement from an Objectivist perspective and see if you can understand the differences:

Objectivist wrote:The issue is that we can have a society that provides protection for worker, consumer and environmental safety along with some minimum standard of living for its members without interfering with the market.


A society of good Objectivists could achieve such a state. Unfortunately, our society is NOT made up exclusively with Objectivists. The movement is still young and the Altruists still hold too much power.

Matt, Government is NOT the answer. Stop worshiping it. "It is in Men that we must place our hope." Lead them to the light by strength of will, stoutness of character and the pure light of Truth. Not by the whip and the gun. Teach them to be Men worthy to be called Americans by living life in a Rational and virtuous way. Work hard, play fair and make amends for your misdeeds and mistakes. All else that follows is right and good.
Last edited by ProfessorDreadNaught on Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:34 pm, edited 5 times in total.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
"Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing."
ProfessorDreadNaught
Community Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby ProfessorDreadNaught » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:28 pm

toad wrote:Have to disagree, those areas are profiting from making cheap commodity goods. Vietnam is a good example. The US exports it's manufacturing to China because it is a cheaper labor market. Recently manufacturing is moving to Vietnam because the labor cost in China have increased exponentially. They have the technical know how for repetitive tasks but usually lack the creativity needed for product innovation. I just don't see their culture embracing creative thinking anytime soon. Which leads me to believe they will be the worlds manufacturing area for some time to come. India is a different situation. They have a cheap skilled labor market but also lack innovation for the moment. From a business prospective I have had nothing but problems with people from India. Non-payment, haggling pre&post contract, and general business underhandedness. Don't get me wrong I have meet some nice people from India but the majority of business people I have meet are sleazy.

Every revolution, be it trains, cars, flight, or technology has created a wealth shift. On the flip side, one of the richest person I know started out hauling trash.


You make my point and don't realize it because you are focused on your own strengths. Most Americans are NOT creative and innovative. Those that are are employed. I agree that our society is geared to produce more creative and innovative people, but it is still just the top 10%. The other 90% compete with the cheap labor pools of the countries you mentioned.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
"Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing."
ProfessorDreadNaught
Community Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby haasd0gg » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:49 pm

And now, the name calling... :roll:
User avatar
haasd0gg
Overlord
 
Posts: 4036
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:32 am
Xfire: haasd0gg

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby [m'kay] » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:10 pm

The think about Objectivism is that it assumes that all the people that are "enlightened" so to speak are going to be good people. It assumes that the people who are strong intellectually are equally strong morally... except that the very idea places those people on a pedestal. The moment you start thinking of yourself as better than other people, you start becoming weaker. You start pushing yourself less and less, and start expecting more from others more and more. Now you might say "oh, that wouldn't be me!", but 9 times out of 10, it would. That is why Objectivism simply doesn't work; the amount of people able to truly adhere to such a philosophy are vastly outmatched by the number of those who think they can.



Anyway, continue on. I'm sure that a few more pages of everyone yelling at eachother instead of trying to reach common ground will be very [m'kay] productive.
User avatar
[m'kay]
MVP
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby ProfessorDreadNaught » Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:29 am

Nargotah wrote:Anyway, continue on. I'm sure that a few more pages of everyone yelling at eachother instead of trying to reach common ground will be very [m'kay] productive.

Two surgeons stand over a dying man each with a scalpel in his hand. The liberal surgeon says "I think its his heart." The conservative surgeon says "No, its his lungs." An idiot walks in and says, "Quit arguing and compromise. Take out his spleen."

I'm not calling you an idiot, unless you think we can just stop arguing over what the problem is and just throw money at it as a solution.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
"Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing."
ProfessorDreadNaught
Community Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby Duel of Fates » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:01 am

Nargotah wrote:Anyway, continue on. I'm sure that a few more pages of everyone yelling at eachother instead of trying to reach common ground will be very [m'kay] productive.

Who is yelling? I see an open and honest difference of opinions being discussed here. I am interested in what MC believes, even though I disagree with 95% of what he believes to be true. And as much as I hate to side with Dread on anything, his arguments are well reasoned and intelligent, and closer to my mindset. So who is yelling?

If you are referring to the "idiot" comment, well . . . I have seen worse. Mostly from some dipstick troll who thinks he is cute when he types out cuss words for the word filter to censor.
Image
User avatar
Duel of Fates
SWBF2 Admin
 
Posts: 2812
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 9:21 pm
Location: I am here, and there.
Xfire: virago777

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby Mandalore » Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:17 pm

Narg has a good point, whose an objectivist who thinks they're part of that 90%?
[04:25] -SR-Mandalore: who pitches and who catches
[04:29] (SWGO)SWINE*FLU: We'll do it in turns.
[04:30] -SR-Mandalore: That sounds super fair
[04:30] -SR-Mandalore: Do you think other gay couples do that?
[04:30] (SWGO)SWINE*FLU: I reckon so.

COMMANDER OTTO:
and you come with the name Mandalore... really CREATIVE.
BY COMMANDER OTTO
Mandalore
Community Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 am

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby toad » Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:46 am

ProfessorDreadNaught wrote:
toad wrote:Have to disagree, those areas are profiting from making cheap commodity goods. Vietnam is a good example. The US exports it's manufacturing to China because it is a cheaper labor market. Recently manufacturing is moving to Vietnam because the labor cost in China have increased exponentially. They have the technical know how for repetitive tasks but usually lack the creativity needed for product innovation. I just don't see their culture embracing creative thinking anytime soon. Which leads me to believe they will be the worlds manufacturing area for some time to come. India is a different situation. They have a cheap skilled labor market but also lack innovation for the moment. From a business prospective I have had nothing but problems with people from India. Non-payment, haggling pre&post contract, and general business underhandedness. Don't get me wrong I have meet some nice people from India but the majority of business people I have meet are sleazy.

Every revolution, be it trains, cars, flight, or technology has created a wealth shift. On the flip side, one of the richest person I know started out hauling trash.


You make my point and don't realize it because you are focused on your own strengths. Most Americans are NOT creative and innovative. Those that are are employed. I agree that our society is geared to produce more creative and innovative people, but it is still just the top 10%. The other 90% compete with the cheap labor pools of the countries you mentioned.

Your figures are way off. Manufacturing is only a small percentage of our economy.
|=======================================================|
Image
User avatar
toad
Community Member
 
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby Matt-Chicago » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:22 pm

Dread, I understand objectivism just fine. When I say you below I do mean objectivists more generally as I don't know you all that well.

You value only intellectual work but not physical labor. You think the millionaires and billionaires are the victims and are enslaved and being held back by all the stupid sheep you thumb your nose down to who struggle to survive, the people who actually keep this country running. This society could not function without the guy who punches the clock and works the long shift, without the guy manning the register at the gas station, without the cleaning crew emptying trash in the night.

Somehow you miss entirely the social nature of man which has been among our most useful traits and are the foundations of modern society -interdependence, community, and sharing. Society has not developed and man progressed by being rugged individualists but rather by working together in an ever more interdependent world.
You are anti social and anti society, egotistical and selfish.

Objectivism is the equivalent of the kids who dress in all black and break windows at protests, just on the opposite side. It's immature intellectual masturbation meant to help people feel better about being selfish pricks.
Politeness is a discipline that compels respectful behavior. Morality is like a politeness of the soul, an etiquette of the inner life, a code of duties, a ceremonial of the essential.
User avatar
Matt-Chicago
Dictator
 
Posts: 2449
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:11 pm
Xfire: mattinchicago

Re: Obama the Post Turtle

Postby ProfessorDreadNaught » Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:42 pm

Matt-Chicago wrote:Dread, I understand objectivism just fine. When I say you below I do mean objectivists more generally as I don't know you all that well.

You value only intellectual work but not physical labor. You think the millionaires and billionaires are the victims and are enslaved and being held back by all the stupid sheep you thumb your nose down to who struggle to survive, the people who actually keep this country running. This society could not function without the guy who punches the clock and works the long shift, without the guy manning the register at the gas station, without the cleaning crew emptying trash in the night.

Somehow you miss entirely the social nature of man which has been among our most useful traits and are the foundations of modern society -interdependence, community, and sharing. Society has not developed and man progressed by being rugged individualists but rather by working together in an ever more interdependent world.
You are anti social and anti society, egotistical and selfish.

Objectivism is the equivalent of the kids who dress in all black and break windows at protests, just on the opposite side. It's immature intellectual masturbation meant to help people feel better about being selfish pricks.


ROFL!
You misunderstand. It's not that I don't value physical labor. I give it it's PROPER value. It is (for the most part) a commodity item. It is in surplus. More precious and rare is the creative thinker, the inventor. I don't "thumb (my) nose down to who struggle to survive," but I don't put them on a pedestal and call them virtuous. I spent six years as an enlisted man in the Marines. I know who the folks who get things done are. I also know where the plans come from, who understands the big picture and why it's more important to keep HIM alive in a firefight than myself.

The WORLD NEEDS SHEEP! But the sheep need the shepherd more. You disdain THAT idea. Or you just don't get it. Most moms and dads want their kids to grow up to be a doctor, a lawyer, an architect or an engineer. They instinctually understand the intellectual trades are what to strive for, in spite of the fact that a line worker at a Ford factory can clear 80K a year after 8 years on the job straight out of High School.

You CERTAINLY don't understand, that at its core, Objectivism is pacifist. DUH! the manifesto (Atlas Shrugged) is about intellectual civil disobedience. (one character DOES use violence, but directed against looted goods and possessions, not people). It's stupid to equate objectivists to anarchists and troublemakers. Objectivists don't do sit-ins, pickets or marches. Thats a tool of the altruist.

Objectivists have a word for altruists and its the same word you use for those thugs in black at protests; Looters.

Listen, I really do value and understand society. What I don't buy is that all men are equal. Whether all men are CREATED equal, I don't know. I know they all have inalienable rights endowed them by the creator. I know that some can and some can't. I know that the purpose of "Collective Bargaining" is to draw strength from the strong to protect the weak. I also know that having power or knowledge does not make one virtuous and that tyranny comes just as easily from the individual as from the collective. But I am sure that "from each man according to his ability and to each man according to his need" is NOT a slogan of social justice but a statement of evil and enslavement.

To answer Mandy and Nargs question about who can and will follow the ideals of Objectivism, I say that I will. To that end I pledge:

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."

Two quotes from Anthem-1945
I need no warrant for being, and no word of sanction upon my being. I am the warrant and the sanction.

The secrets of this earth are not for all men to see, but only for those who seek them.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.”
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
"Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing."
ProfessorDreadNaught
Community Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Non-Game Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests